MKLaw

When Big Business and Big Government Cross the Line

Proven at the United States Supreme Court

National strategic group litigation for coalitions, organizations, and the people they represent, in federal and state courts across the country.

  • Two First Amendment merits victories
  • Coast to coast

Election law, argued at every level

From polling place speech at the United States Supreme Court to state election commissions and county boards, we represent citizens and coalitions who keep elections accountable.

  • MVA v. Mansky, U.S. Supreme Court
  • 60+ cases in Wisconsin

Medical Injustice Reversed in the Seventh and Eighth Circuits

Five federal appellate rulings in 2024 and 2025 returned religious accommodation cases to the district courts. The record is public, and the work continues.

  • Ringhofer
  • Bube
  • Passarella
  • Cole
  • Brokken

Standing ground for owners and communities

From windfarm siting fights to the right to pursue farming, we represent the people whose property and livelihood are on the line, wherever the fight is.

  • No Columbia Wind
  • Save Farm Occupation

One firm for the whole fight

Strategic group litigation on the national stage, backed by a full-service commercial practice.

Two First Amendment victories at the United States Supreme Court

Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 2018, striking down Minnesota's polling place apparel ban. Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 2002, protecting judicial candidates' speech. Both are published merits decisions; both are in the record below.

The Record

Verified in the reporters, not the brochure

Every matter below is a published decision or active public docket. Follow any of them to the primary source.

Outcome: Victory

Election Integrity

Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky

U.S. Supreme Court, 2018

Minnesota's polling place apparel ban held unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

Case page

Outcome: Victory

Free Speech

Republican Party of Minnesota v. White

U.S. Supreme Court, 2002

Judicial candidates' speech protected under the First Amendment.

Case page

Outcome: Settled

Medical Justice

Cole v. Group Health Plan, Inc.

Eighth Circuit, 2024

Dismissal reversed; religious discrimination claims returned to the district court.

Case page

Outcome: Settled

Medical Justice

Ringhofer v. Mayo Clinic, Ambulance

Eighth Circuit, 2024

Dismissal reversed; religious accommodation claims returned to the district court.

Case page

Outcome: Settled

Medical Justice

Passarella v. Aspirus, Inc.

Seventh Circuit, 2024

Dismissal reversed; religious accommodation claims returned to the district court.

Case page

Outcome: Settled

Medical Justice

Bube v. Aspirus Hospital, Inc.

Seventh Circuit, 2024

Dismissal reversed; religious accommodation claims returned to the district court.

Case page

Outcome: Settled

Medical Justice

Brokken v. Hennepin County

Eighth Circuit, 2025

Dismissal reversed in relevant part; claims returned to the district court.

Case page

Outcome: Victory

Free Speech

281 Care Committee v. Arneson

Eighth Circuit, 2014

Minnesota's false political speech statute held unconstitutional.

Case page

Outcome: Victory

Business and Property Rights

Styczinski v. Arnold

Eighth Circuit, 2022

Dormant Commerce Clause challenge to Minnesota's bullion regulation.

Case page

Appellate reversals are procedural rulings that returned each case to the district court. Results depend on the facts and law of each matter.

A national practice, shown state by state

Lawyers of the firm are admitted in seven states: Minnesota, Iowa, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Those are the states shaded below. Filter by front, or follow a state to its matters.

Minnesota: Home office. Seven published matters, from the Eighth Circuit to the United States Supreme Court.MontanaNorth DakotaIdahoWashingtonArizonaCaliforniaColoradoNevadaNew MexicoOregonUtahWyomingArkansasIowa: Attorneys of the firm are admitted in Iowa.KansasMissouriNebraskaOklahomaSouth Dakota: Attorneys of the firm are admitted in South Dakota.LouisianaTexasConnecticutMassachusettsNew HampshireRhode IslandVermontAlabamaFloridaGeorgiaMississippiSouth CarolinaIllinois: Attorneys of the firm are admitted in Illinois.IndianaKentuckyNorth CarolinaOhioTennesseeVirginiaWisconsin: Bube v. Aspirus Hospital in the Seventh Circuit, plus the Wisconsin election accountability docket.West VirginiaDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaMarylandNew JerseyNew YorkPennsylvania: Attorneys of the firm are admitted in Pennsylvania.MaineMichigan: Michigan Electors civil rights suit, an active public docket, and the parental rights opt-out litigation.AlaskaHawaii

Shaded states are the seven where a lawyer of the firm is admitted to practice. Appellate work reaches further, through the Seventh, Eighth, and Federal Circuits and the United States Supreme Court. No claim is made about states not shown.

Three spotlights, one national practice

A full-service commercial practice

The same trial and appellate lawyers who take on the government represent banks, businesses, and families in the matters that build a life's work.

  • Banking and corporate law
  • Commercial and residential real estate
  • Land use and zoning
  • Estate planning, guardianship, and conservatorship
  • Administrative license hearings
  • Personal injury, medical malpractice, and wrongful death
  • Trial and appellate practice
City skyline at midday under a clear blue sky

Start

Four doors, one firm

Tell us which one you are walking through and we route you to the right lawyer, with a conflict check before anything substantive is discussed.

Which door are you walking through?