When Big Business and Big Government Cross the Line
Proven at the United States Supreme Court
National strategic group litigation for coalitions, organizations, and the people they represent, in federal and state courts across the country.
When Big Business and Big Government Cross the Line
National strategic group litigation for coalitions, organizations, and the people they represent, in federal and state courts across the country.
From polling place speech at the United States Supreme Court to state election commissions and county boards, we represent citizens and coalitions who keep elections accountable.
Five federal appellate rulings in 2024 and 2025 returned religious accommodation cases to the district courts. The record is public, and the work continues.
From windfarm siting fights to the right to pursue farming, we represent the people whose property and livelihood are on the line, wherever the fight is.
Strategic group litigation on the national stage, backed by a full-service commercial practice.
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 2018, striking down Minnesota's polling place apparel ban. Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 2002, protecting judicial candidates' speech. Both are published merits decisions; both are in the record below.
The Record
Every matter below is a published decision or active public docket. Follow any of them to the primary source.
Election Integrity
U.S. Supreme Court, 2018
Minnesota's polling place apparel ban held unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
Case page
Outcome: VictoryFree Speech
U.S. Supreme Court, 2002
Judicial candidates' speech protected under the First Amendment.
Case page
Outcome: SettledMedical Justice
Eighth Circuit, 2024
Dismissal reversed; religious discrimination claims returned to the district court.
Case page
Outcome: SettledMedical Justice
Eighth Circuit, 2024
Dismissal reversed; religious accommodation claims returned to the district court.
Case page
Outcome: SettledMedical Justice
Seventh Circuit, 2024
Dismissal reversed; religious accommodation claims returned to the district court.
Case page
Outcome: SettledMedical Justice
Seventh Circuit, 2024
Dismissal reversed; religious accommodation claims returned to the district court.
Case page
Outcome: SettledMedical Justice
Eighth Circuit, 2025
Dismissal reversed in relevant part; claims returned to the district court.
Case page
Outcome: VictoryFree Speech
Eighth Circuit, 2014
Minnesota's false political speech statute held unconstitutional.
Case page
Outcome: VictoryBusiness and Property Rights
Eighth Circuit, 2022
Dormant Commerce Clause challenge to Minnesota's bullion regulation.
Case page
Appellate reversals are procedural rulings that returned each case to the district court. Results depend on the facts and law of each matter.
Lawyers of the firm are admitted in seven states: Minnesota, Iowa, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Those are the states shaded below. Filter by front, or follow a state to its matters.
Shaded states are the seven where a lawyer of the firm is admitted to practice. Appellate work reaches further, through the Seventh, Eighth, and Federal Circuits and the United States Supreme Court. No claim is made about states not shown.
Representing citizens, legislators, and coalitions in election accountability litigation across multiple states, from local boards to the United States Supreme Court.
Religious accommodation employment litigation with a federal appellate record: three 2024 and 2025 rulings returned dismissed cases to the district courts.
Standing with property owners, businesses, farmers, and communities against takings, siting decisions, and regulatory overreach, from local hearings to federal court.
Opt-out and curriculum transparency litigation building on Mahmoud v. Taylor.
Visit the frontFirst Amendment litigation from campus viewpoint neutrality to political speech prosecutions.
Visit the frontThe same trial and appellate lawyers who take on the government represent banks, businesses, and families in the matters that build a life's work.

Start
Tell us which one you are walking through and we route you to the right lawyer, with a conflict check before anything substantive is discussed.